scorecardresearch
Sunday, Aug 13, 2023
Advertisement

Digital Personal Data Protection Bill: Spectre of a Barbenheimer future

With the new data protection law and the proposed Digital India Act, governance in India is at an inflection point

Data protection bill, new data protection law, Digital India Act, Digital India, right to privacy, personal data, constitutinal rights, Barbenheimer future, Openheimer, digital literacy, indian express newsTechnologies, policies and practices will continue to collide over the years to shape India’s digital and lived reality. (Representational Image)
Listen to this article
Digital Personal Data Protection Bill: Spectre of a Barbenheimer future
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

India at 75 is still taking baby steps into the realm of data privacy. It has been just five years since we acquired a definitive right to privacy. A law on digital data protection, very different from the one that was debated for half a decade, is now imminent. Public consciousness and behaviour on the subject are also evolving. Meanwhile, pools of personal data are being assembled and processed all around us.

Technologies, policies and practices will continue to collide over the years to shape India’s digital and lived reality. Numerous scenarios could emerge, including the two imagined here. The first, which I refer to as the Barbenheimer future, would rely heavily on technocentric solutionism combined with digital escapism. The second imagines a more equitable digital society born out of the wishful optimism for a more privacy and digital rights-respecting future.

Given the twists and turns in India’s data protection story it seems fitting to start with the Barbenheimer analogy. “Barbenheimer” is an internet phenomenon that emerged from the simultaneous release and divergent themes of the films Barbie and Oppenheimer. Their link with India’s digital future may seem remote. But, as the side-view mirror tells us, objects may sometimes be closer than they appear.

An Oppenheimer-style future will be founded on stubborn faith in technology to manage all aspects of the polity. Digital technologies, often with high-risks, will be seen as the path to sovereignty, domination, progress and empowerment. Like the men behind Oppenheimer’s atomic bomb, a privileged group of technical experts, bureaucrats, and politicians will get to choose which technologies India should adopt and how. Laws will become a smokescreen for protection, as privacy and other rights routinely succumb to security and nation-building interests. Surveillance, data leaks and various forms of exclusion will be routine social realities, bitter pills to be swallowed for the greatest good of the greatest number.

In parallel, citizens will find solace in a Barbie-like metaverse curated by large tech corporations. In this escapist world, life will be experienced through rose-tinted glasses, surrounded by like-minded Barbies and Kens, imagining the rights of our choosing. But this will of course be only a simulated environment powered by virtual reality and artificial intelligence. Personal data will be the fodder and the yield of this hyper-personalised ecosystem. In the process, digital citizens would either be treated as subjects, to be “protected” and overseen by the state or users, to be entertained and surveilled by corporations.

In contrast, the equitable digital future will be citizen-centric by design. Its equity will reflect in the relationship between citizens and the state and their interactions with responsible private actors. This imagination assumes that in the immediate future India will adopt a sound legal structure for data protection supported by an independent data protection agency. Unlike the current version, this law will offer meaningful protections that apply equally to the private sector and state agencies. It will not carve broad exceptions in the name of national security and law enforcement or create backdoors for government access. In parallel, comprehensive surveillance reforms will guarantee that citizens’ privacy is protected by judicial oversight and robust procedural safeguards.

Beyond privacy, the digital rights toolkit would have also evolved in many other ways. India will have universal digital access, a sophisticated cyber security apparatus, nuanced jurisprudence on online speech and expression, and a sound framework for AI governance. All these instruments would have emerged through open engagement with stakeholders, prioritising human rights, accountability and trust.

Advertisement

A shift in societal attitudes will complement these legal and institutional changes. Well before 2047, assertion and respect for privacy will be ingrained in everyday life. Digital safety and data empowerment will be part of school curriculums and in family conversations. In that future, it will be unimaginable for a group of individuals to subject someone to the kind of indignity that recently surfaced in Manipur, whether online or offline. WhatsApp conversations flashing on news media and rash internet shutdowns will similarly become historical ills that were overcome through socio-legal-political reforms.

The equitable digital future will also gain from the advancement of privacy enhancing technologies. Encrypted data processing will be the norm for all transactions and data anonymisation techniques would have evolved significantly. India will also leverage its experience in building digital public goods to pursue meaningful data empowerment. The current version of such an architecture is limited to collecting user consent electronically and enabling data sharing. This design is arguably more empowering for data users than individuals. But maturity in India’s data protection regime will cause a bottom-up reimagining of such systems to foster greater agency for individuals and communities and accountability from data users.

With the new data protection law and the proposed Digital India Act, India is at an inflection point of digital governance. The choices we make today will influence where India will find itself in the next 25 years. This implies not just policy choices but also societal, technological and personal ones. Hopefully, the sum of these choices will land us somewhere closer to the equitable future imagined here than the Barbenheimer one.

Also Read
coomi kapoor writes, modi bjp parliament
delhi GNCTD article 239AA
Bill to replace IPC
Partition of India, Partition Horrors Remembrance Day, India Pakistan partition, Partition of Bangladesh, Mohammad Ali jinnah, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawahar Lal Nehru, Muslim league, RSS, opinion, indian express, indian express news
Advertisement

The writer is a fellow at the CyberBRICS Project, FGV Law School

First published on: 12-08-2023 at 07:20 IST
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close